A penetration test should feel like a reality check, not another corporate chore. At its best, it’s like having a trusted locksmith rattle your doors and windows to show you which ones need better locks. At its worst, it becomes a ticked box on a compliance form, and nothing changes. In the Czech Republic, these tests are commonly called penetrační testy, which literally translates as “penetration tests.” Local firms and international providers offer these services, bringing in teams of ethical hackers who behave just like real attackers would—only in a safe, controlled way. They don’t just run scans; they dig into websites, applications, and cloud platforms to find the weak spots, then explain in plain language how to patch them. The real aim isn’t to embarrass your IT team but to help strengthen defenses and give your business a fighting chance. Skip this step, and you’re not really protecting your company—you’re just crossing your fingers and hoping for luck.
Mistake 1: Treating It Like an Audit
Too often, managers approach penetration testing the way they approach annual audits: a box to check. But this isn’t about passing or failing—it’s about learning. The real purpose is to see if your systems and people hold up when someone genuinely tries to break in.
Think of it like fire drills. Nobody grades you on whether you evacuated “perfectly.” The point is to practice, find the bottlenecks, and be ready for the real thing.
Mistake 2: Narrowing the Scope Too Much
It’s tempting to save money by testing only one application or server. But attackers don’t follow your budget lines. They look for the forgotten WordPress install, the dusty server in the corner, or the vendor integration that nobody pays attention to.
I once saw a company test only their shiny new app. It passed. Months later, criminals slipped in through an old testing environment that hadn’t been updated in years. Scope matters—don’t limit your view to what’s convenient.
Mistake 3: Keeping Testers in the Dark
Some leaders think withholding information makes the exercise “more real.” In practice, it just burns time. Real attackers might spend weeks or months poking around. Your testers usually have a tight window. Give them the maps and background so they can focus on meaningful attacks, not on reinventing the wheel.
It’s like hiring a mechanic but refusing to tell them where the strange noise comes from. Sure, they’ll find it eventually, but wouldn’t you rather get to the solution faster?
Mistake 4: Ignoring the People Factor
Firewalls and code matter, but people are still the easiest entry point. Phishing emails, reused passwords, or even someone holding the door open can undo months of investment in technology.
One finance firm I came across had flawless systems on paper. But in a phishing simulation, nearly a third of staff clicked a fake invoice. That was all it took. Security isn’t just tech—it’s behavior.
Mistake 5: Forgetting to Follow Through
Here’s the most damaging mistake: doing the test, reading the report, and then shelving it. Vulnerabilities don’t fix themselves. If you don’t act, you’ve just paid for a very expensive piece of paper.
It’s the same as going to a doctor, getting told to cut down on sugar, and then eating a donut on the way home. The test only matters if you act on it.
Why Companies Should Care
Penetration testing isn’t about paranoia—it’s about preparation. Without it, you’re guessing about your defenses, and guessing in cybersecurity is reckless. With it, you get clarity, a roadmap, and often a few uncomfortable truths. But those truths are what save money, reputation, and sometimes the business itself.
Plenty of security firms specialize in this, from small boutique agencies in Prague to large international consultancies. They bring experience from testing hundreds of environments and can often spot patterns your in‑house team might overlook. Bringing them in isn’t a sign of weakness—it’s a sign you take your future seriously.
Final Thoughts
The biggest mistakes in penetration testing come down to mindset. Treat it as a real learning opportunity, not a tick‑box task. Don’t limit the scope, don’t starve testers of info, don’t forget about people, and above all, don’t ignore the results. Whether you call them penetration tests or penetrační testy, the companies that benefit most are those that welcome uncomfortable feedback and act on it. That’s not just good cybersecurity—it’s smart, sustainable business.
Quick FAQs
Should penetration tests include physical attempts?
Sometimes, yes. Good testers may try social engineering or even physical entry if agreed in scope.
How often should penetration tests be done?
Once a year at minimum, and after major system changes.
Who should carry them out?
Independent experts or firms, not your internal IT team. Fresh eyes catch more.
Will it disrupt operations?
Done properly, no. Reputable testers coordinate closely to avoid major interruptions.
Read Dive is a leading technology blog focusing on different domains like Blockchain, AI, Chatbot, Fintech, Health Tech, Software Development and Testing. For guest blogging, please feel free to contact at readdive@gmail.com.
